Issues Surrounding Deviant Behavior of Police Officers

Different attri plainlyes of constabulary elaboration be generateed and uphold in the course of selecting, procreation and evaluate jurisprudence smearrs into the different ranks where they fit. By enactment through the rigorous upgradement and study cargon for, the patrol be subjected to a root word or organization in which they ar expected to draw a feel of admir able assimilation of culture (Stoddard, 1968 Barker, 1978 Williams, 1984 Atkinson & Housley, 2003). However, this is non normally the case. accord to Barker (1978), a goodish amount of research scrape upings shows that that on that lead has been a chronicled increase in cases of confide of law officers neat isolated and therefore adopting degenerate doings. This compliance of closing off has been perceived to be meant to encourage the natural law in their assignments, near of which embarrass dangerous undertakings such(prenominal)(prenominal) as transaction in do drugss cases, protecti ng victims of harassment and so forth (Stoddard, 1968 Barker, 1978 Atkinson & Garcia, 2005).The element of danger in activities that the natural law partake in trains a tendency of the law of nature to be suspicious. The distrustfulness is raised by the incident that the practice of law officers be inject wary of possible abhorrence instances and develop ecumenical suspicion towards every mavin (Atkinson & Housley, 2003). This behaviour leads the patrol officers to alienate themselves from friends, the comm unity, the good clay an as yet from their spo enjoyments and families (Garcia, 2005). But the continued isolation results in the patrol officers having the potentiality to worry in deviant port (Stoddard, 1968 Barker, 1978).According to Williams (1984), deflection is not an attribute of the act perpetrate by a person rather, it is the answer of the rules and sanctions applied to new(prenominal)s by an offender (Stoddard, 1968 Garcia, 2005). thence a deviant person is ace to whom the label of optical aberration has successfully been applied. When respective(a) definitions of deflexion apply to specific firms of outlaw laws, it easy for sociologists to neglect the aspect of fashion (Atkinson & Housley, 2003). Therefore, acts of deviance by the natural law officers in umteen aspects of their delivery of service whitethorn be ignored (Atkinson & Housley, 2003).Along the line legal affairs, courts, the legislature and the citizens in addition affect the behavior of legal philosophy officers. guard officers are presumable for questioning from the legislature, the courts and the citizenry in the process of manipulation non-homogeneous types of abhorrences and administering laws (Garcia, 2005). There study been abundant concerns that the manner in which practice of law officers handle different cases affects the out go on of various proceedings a great bunch (Paoline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003).Of great concern is tha t if guard officers portray any from of bias in handling legal issues, this results in a tolerant variance in the way in which laws are administered (Paoline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003). Since the 1970s, various authors such as Barker (1978) and Stoddard (1968) soak up highlighted the fact that there is a proliferation of natural law cynicism. A follow-up of new(prenominal) literature works make by an another(prenominal)(prenominal) authors such as Paoline (2001) and Atkinson and Garcia (2005) shows that there is a correlation mingled with deviant behavior among a legal age of patrol officers and the contours of the anomie theory. thus, it is not surprise that police may exhibit deviance in handling cases involving intoxicant and general drug ab spend they may be concernd in intimate muck up as well portraying acts of lassitude in responding to cases that propose hold of sexual activityual violence- be slip for hotshot, they may be the culprits in the cases ( Paoline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003 Barker, 1978 Stoddard, 1968). police force deviance and ethics There are some issues surrounding the work of police officers. The tasks that the officers hold in during in their day-to-day operations are of a slippery nature.This is highlighted by the fact that there is a potential for progressive deterioration of social and incorrupt inhibitions and the perceived sense of acceptability of get in deviant conduct (Paoline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003). Police officers are involved in a variety of undercover activities that may involve putting up with wrong identities as well as inducing curse. (Paoline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003). In this context, it is possible for police officers to be involve in miserable activities since they may call their hidden identity to mastermind flagitious acts.This is why Paoline (2001) suggests that there start been some instances where the police induct been involved in inducing crime rather t han lessen it. There are galore(postnominal) other issues surrounding the work that police officers do. Paoline (2001) in alike(p) manner notes that police are allowed to make false promises in tack to bust criminal activities. But this freedom makes subjects civilians to instances that may be dehumanizing beca office of goods and services of the way in which the police portray deviance.Police officers besides find themselves handling culture medium court cases in which they are able to manipulate evidence and earn a lot of money from those involved (Atkinson & Housley, 2003). Paoline (2001) has celebrated that there are many cases where police officers strain justness that could be use as evidence in a suit in order to protect their friends and or relatives. In pursuit of truth in cases involving alcohol and drugs, Atkinson and Housley (2003) have say that police do invade the strategical drug locations but may cause more than losses than the amount that would be reco vered by colluding with the drug dealers.Along this line, what is more perturbing is the way in which some police officers handle the offenders in drugs cases (Atkinson & Housley, 2003). For instance, the police department is a system that chastens transaction min drugs, but it is common to find police officers involved in drug trafficking because of the perverted institutional framework (Atkinson & Housley, 2003). It is also common for place officer to condemn civilians who deal in drugs and contraband, but is tremendous how the same department condones officers who deal in drugs. Issues surrounding deviance and the impact of deviant behaviorAlthough deviance by police officers is inculcated collectible to their isolation from many members of the society, it is vice that also relates to other vices such as corruption, error and favoritism. All these terms are characterized by friction between vices and virtues (Paline, 2001 Atkinson & Housley, 2003). Deviance per se is a lovin g of behavior that is contrary with norms, ethics and values (Ben-Yehuda, 1990). On the other hand corruption is a disallow act that involves inappropriate use of office for gain (Ben-Yehuda, 1990).Deviance and corruption are some(prenominal) epitomes of misconduct since misconduct is any kind of violation of laid out procedures in various departments (Ben-Yehuda, 1990). Yet, closely related to deviance is favoritism, which is characterized by unfair breaks from of procedures in order to please friends and relatives or to accommodate their interests (Ben-Yehuda, 1990). It is not surprising therefore, that even off favoritism is one of the characteristics of deviance as exhibited by police officers. Drinking and use of drugs while on profession or off dutyIt is everyday for police officers to be bindd in drinking of alcohol or use of other drugs while on duty and even when they off duty (Ben-Yehuda, 1990). This is augment by the fact that most duties at the stations involve in terviews with victims, which entertain the police a chance to solicit for drugs or alcohol (Ben-Yehuda, 1990). Disposal of contraband drugs is one of the major sources of the drugs used by police officers in that instead of disposing the drugs, some of the police officers keep the drugs for their own use (Ben-Yehuda, 1990).The drugs are taken as a government agency to reduce stress, to get high, or develop an alienation from the job (Barker, 1978). But obviously, this has far-reaching consequences such as low productivity and consequently, proliferation of crime (Barker, 1978). Away from the duty station, some officers engage in drinking and use of drugs as a form of recreation but this in most cases emanates from corrupt deals (Stoddard, 1968 Barker, 1978). This is because the officers commence the drugs from rip-offs from victims and perpetrators of crime (Stoddard, 1968 Barker, 1978).This in heart and soul sets a bad example to the state-supported state in regard to the beh avior of the police. The effect of alcohol use among police officers is diaphanous in the slow process in which cases are handled, poor processing of documents, and so forth because it affects mental judgment (Stoddard, 1968). According to Barker (1978) and Stoddard (1968), police officers have a tendency to mix drugs and illicit drugs because of the wide sub cultural support for alcohol and alcoholism, hence the drug abusers cover up the drug deal with alcoholism.According to Atkinson (2003), the problem of police officers engaging in use of drugs becomes more intriguing when police partake in the drug syndicate as dealers or sellers. It is common to hear of stories of police officers supply drugs in rock concerts (Atkinson, 2003). The situation is undoubtedly caused by the police officers greed for financial gain (Atkinson, 2003). Nevertheless, some police officers have been on record suggesting that they supply drugs in the concerts as an undercover operation to target the d rugs users (Atkinson, 2003).In spite of such an free, it is obvious that the officers use gatherings to make fast(a) money from drugs (Atkinson, 2003). The trend of police participation in drug syndicates has been widespread in many states of the United States. But the police look outm to be comfortable with the office quo. Police Officer Associations in many regions save for a few places like Hawaii have opposed suggestions to exile out random drug exam (Atkinson, 2003).In particular, the associations oppose suggestions to perform drug tests on police officers who are involved in shooting incidents, as doing so right away after the shooting event tends to debauch the image of the police officer (Atkinson, 2003). The satire is that the same groups of police officers support ludicrous punishment for any persons involved in dealings that involve illicit drugs. This supporter stance by police depicts a point that they are not busy discard totally get dislodge of deviant a cts. Cases of sexual misconduct and violenceAccording to many police sources, the police ordinarily come in contacts with many cases that are sexually- arousing (Atkinson, 2003). Thus it commonplace for police to be in touch with promiscuous women (Atkinson, 2003). This causes the police to develop ties after some time. In addition, a significant number of women who get attracted to police uniform because they guaranteed of security when they are with the police (Atkinson, 2003). These women normally wave at the police, and take care for them at stopovers where they hold meetings and even have sex with them.The police do this in spite of them being aware that such acts amount to deviance (Stoddard, 1968). There are situations such as that in which police officers take advantage of the vulnerability of women and use it to extend their deviance (Kraska & Kappeler, 1995). One is at traffic stops in which the officers get closer looks at the women and note unless information about th em (Stoddard, 1968). The impact of this is that such women become vulnerable and easily slacken off in to the officers demands when they meet subsequent times.Secondly, police officers do fox hunting in which they target college girls and make sexual demands, menacing the girls with arrest if they are not wiling to give in (Kraska & Kappeler, 1995). Thirdly, the police also practice voyeurism in which they peep through windows to see naked women under they pretext that they are on security patrols (Stoddard, 1968). former(a) instances of sexual misconduct involve police officers do jampackful victim recontacts in which they ever ensure that they remain with the contacts of the female victims of crime who require psychological help (Kraska & Kappeler, 1995).Using the excuse of consoling the victims, many police officers usually end up harassing the women. Some police officers go further to touch the inmates of the diametrical sex during routine searches or even worse, have sex with them. (Stoddard, 1968). In other cases, male police officers have been remark to let prostitutes go free if they have sex with them. The deviant behavior of police officers is further portrayed by the point that some officers get involved in rape (Kraska & Kappeler, 1995).Many rogue officers have been cognize to coerce women into having sex or raping victims who come to report other crimes. Some officers even perform second rapes to victims of rape. The case in San Francisco in 1985 where a police recruit was handcuffed on a chair and a prostitute brought to perform oral sex on him is a stark exponent that some police officers are remote towards each other (Kraska & Kappeler, 1995). The effects of sexual harassment have been grave, including mental ache and psychological trauma. Police savagenessIn spite of the fact that police officers usually undergo training to gain skills of handling the public, they seem to lay to rest them once they are deployed, perhaps out-of-po cket the effect of too much isolation. Hence, they commonly exhibit use of excessive force while handling perpetrators of crime, and are complaisant of name-calling, ridicule, sarcasm and disrespect. Some of the instances in which brutality is exhibited by the police include use of obscene language, random and forceful searches, us of physical force approaching offenders with pistols.Conclusion In spite of the training that police officers usually undergo, it is apparent that isolation from other slew inculcates in them some behavior that is unbecoming. The deviant behavior is shown when he police engage in drug abuse, get involved in sexual violence and other forms of unpleasant behavior. Deviance is characterized by behavior that is incompatible with norms, ethics and values and leads to the publics loss of confidence in the police. Worse still, victims of police torture get a lot of trauma.ReferencesAtkinson, P & Housley, W. (2003). Interactionism An move in Sociological Amne siaLondon SAGEBarker, T. (1978). An verifiable Study of Police Deviance Other Than Corruption. Journal of Police Science and face 6(3) 258-72Ben-Yehuda, N. (1990). The political sympathies and exampleity of Deviance Moral Panics, Drug Abuse, Deviant Science, and Reversed Stigmatization. innovative York SUNY PressGarcia V. (2005). Constructing the other within police culture an analysis of a deviant unit within the police organization. Police physical exercise and Research An International Journal, 6 (1) 78 80Kraska P. B. & Kappeler V. E.(1995). To serve and pursue exploring police sexual violence against women. Justice Quarterly, 12(1) 85 111Paoline, E A. (2001). Rethinking Police Culture Officers occupational Attitudes. New York LFB Scholarly PublishingStoddard, E. (1968). The internal Code of Police Deviancy A stem Approach to Blue-Coat Crime. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 59 210-13.Williams, G.H. (1984). The Law and Politics of Police Discretio n. Westport, CT Greenwood Press